Which NFL Teams Should Move, and Where?

For the first time since the mid-1990s, we have relocation drama in the NFL. Three teams - the San Diego Chargers, the Oakland Raiders, and the St. Louis Rams - are vying for the right to move back to their once-home city of Los Angeles. (My thoughts on this mirror this NSFW take from Deadspin, but I suppose that is neither here nor there.)

While I am absolutely 100% out on the NFL as a consumer product, this development did get me thinking about an "optimal relocation plan" that maximized the number of large markets the NFL had teams in.

You could make the case that diversifying markets is the best growth plan for a league, and putting 32 teams in 32 distinct cities is the best way to maximize the total population that cares about the league. But that's not what the league is doing right now - they are looking to move up to two teams into Los Angeles to match the two-team NFL markets in New York City, the SF Bay Area, and the Washington-Baltimore metro area.

So here's my very simple approach. I'm going to look at the largest metropolitan markets as defined by Primary Statistical Areas. I'm going to take the top markets based on 2014 population estimates and decide which cities are given NFL franchises. And in order to allow for multiple teams in the same city, I'm going to grant a second team to any market that has at least 4x the population of the next most competitive city, assuming that fans will split their loyalties 75%-25%.

If we take this approach and determine 32 teams, here is who ends up losing their franchises:

And here's where these franchises end up going:So who moves where? Here are some thoughts:Is the new NFL better than today's NFL? Who cares, I still won't watch. But maybe this is the endgame that the owners are working towards someday!

-rj